perm filename MSGLOG[S,AIL]12 blob sn#046154
filedate 1973-06-05 generic text, type T, neo UTF8
I fixed up the file of this morning's message (but still have a listing
in case you want to see it) but it still "DRYROTS". The file is
TRY.SAI[G,MJC]. Is there something special I should know about for-stmts?
17-NOV-72 1742 G,MJC
A program which I wrote to try to learn a few things (namely SAIL and the
Quam display routines) uncovered a "DRYROT" error. The program is
TRY.SAI[G,MJC], and the error occurred in line 2600. Any suggestions?
JAM again. Sorry, it doesn't go away with
an "IF TRUE THEN", only with an "IF FOO THEN"
22-NOV-72 2344 MA,JAM
JAM here bringing to you yet another
insidious SAIL bug. There is a program
BUG.SAI[MA,JAM] which compiles the following
code incorrectly (see page 6 of source file):
REAL ARRAY Y[1:LN+GWIDTH];
*** LOTS OF STUFF ***
INTEGER ARRAY BUF[1:5500];
*** MORE STUFF ***
The following code appears:
DPGT&DPGT.-6/ PUSHJ P,BEXIT
DPGT&DPGT.-5/ PUSH P,3 ; LOWER ARRAY BOUND???
DPGT&DPGT.-4/ PUSH P,[=5500] ; THIS IS OK
DPGT&DPGT.-3/ PUSH P,3 ; IT SEEMS TO THINK AC3 CONTAINS A 1
DPGT&DPGT.-2/ PUSHJ P,ARRMAK
This, of course, gets a "UPPER BOUND<LOWER BOUND" error
message, for constant bounds yet! Anyway, the problem
goes away if you put an "IF TRUE THEN" in front of
the BEGIN "DPGT". Is that enough?
22-NOV-72 2341 MA,JAM
CASE n OF (ITV, ITV, ... ITV) generates, in at least one case
DONE: POP P,TBITS2
MOVE A,0 ;!!!!!!!!!!!
This is fairly recent (MOVE s/b MOVE A,TBITS2 or whatever).
20-NOV-72 0341 SLS,DCS
I RAN INTO PROBLEMS WHEN USING THE SAIL DPB COMMAND.
THE CODE GENERATED FOR THE INSTRUCTION
SEEMED TO LOAD A INTO REGESTER 10 AND PROMPTLY DEPOSIT REG 11.
THE PROGRAM IS TEST.SAI ON [1,EMC], AND THE OFFENDING LINE IS IN THE
AIVCT1 PROCEDURE FOUND ON PAGE 4, I BELIEVE.
19-NOV-72 0831 1,EMC
DON'T PUT UP THE NEW SAIL.
TWO DEMOS ON MONDAY. THIS WOULD
BE THE 4TH DEMO IN SUCCESSION IMMED
AFTER A SAIL CHANGE.
07-DEC-72 1419 H,HJS
K PINGLE FOUND A BUG HAVING TO DO WITH AN ILLEGIT. ARRAY NAME IN AN
ARERR UUO FOR COMPLICATED EXPRS. SERIOUS ENOUGH TO FIX. SEE BUG #KR.
06-DEC-72 2219 SLS,DCS
NASTY BUG IN SAIL SETBREAK(TABLE,STRDELIM,STRDELETE,SWITCHES);
IF YOU DO A SETBREAK WITH CHARACTERS TO BE DELETED,
THEN LATER IN THE PROGRAM YOU DO ANOTHER SETBREAK ON THE SAME TABLE NUMBER
WITH NULL STRDELETE, IT CONTINUES TO USE THE OLD STRDELETE!!!!
06-JAN-73 1737 1,REM
Is my observation correct? I have a block full of
CONTINUEs, and I find that the first one jumps to
the second, the second jumps to the third, and so
on to the last one!!???
04-JAN-73 0959 MA,JAM
The SAIL error: BEGIN AND END DO NOT MATCH
could be more helpful in telling which are
the BEGIN block names.
19-DEC-72 1609 WRU,TOB
JAM here. I have a SAIL program that I said ↑C - SAVE
to. The dump copy is SAVBUG.DMP[MA,JAM]. If you RUN it,
it generally says "ERROR IN JOB 26, PC EXCEEDS MEM BOUND
AT USER 400013", indicating to me that the second segment
isn't hooked up. If you GET it and START it, sometimes it
works and sometimes not. This doesn't seem to happen if I
SAVE the program before it is ever run for the first time.
If I start it up, then stop it and save it, this often
Please delete the file SAVBUG.DMP[MA,JAM] when
you are finished with it.
18-DEC-72 1151 MA,JAM
export version of sail should not have dump never bit on in
rel files created. fancyy technique for writing over ddt doesn't seem
to work with export.
16-DEC-72 1444 S,JRL
THE 7-LINE PROGRAM BUG.SAI[1,REM] COMPILES INCORRECTLY BY SAIL.
JNAM←CVSIX("[LXGP]"); COMPILES AS MOVSI NIC,0;MOVEM NIC,JNAM;
14-JAN-73 1824 1,REM
YOU OUGHT TO FIX SAIL SO YOU CAN SPECIFY ODD FILE NAMES, LIKE [-AP-].DMP
IN AN ENTER. PERHAPS, ADOPT THE COPY CONVENTION ABOUT ↓ TO SURROUND A
01-FEB-73 1236 TAP,REG
There is a deeper bug but you can cure your immediate problem by parenthesizing
the expression TK([A⊗O≡V]) in your macro IV. Syntactically the parens are
required since a boolean expression inside a foreach associative context musht
06-FEB-73 1126 S,JRL
IT USED TO BE THAT INCHWL WAS ONLY TERMINATED BY <CRLF> NOT
BY <ALT> OR <LF> OR BARE <CR> OR ANY OTHER ACTIVATION CHARACTER.
A FEW MONTHS AGO INCHWL BEGAN TO BE TERMINATED BY THE OTHER ACTIVATION
CHARACTERS AS WELL. THIS LASTED FOR ABOUT A MONTH, THEN RETURNED TO
THE <CRLF> ONLY METHOD. NOW TONITE I FIND THAT INCHWL IS AGAIN TERMINATED
BY ANY ACTIVATION CHARACTERS. WHY DOES IT KEEP CHANGING???
06-FEB-73 0124 1,REM
The next person to make a new compiler might have some KVL typos to contend
with (Gen pg 51,52,53 and Hel pg 15) due to implementation of ACCESS. The
slow system prevents me from making a compiler myself today.
-peace and love - KVL
06-MAR-73 1430 1,KVL
BOTH OLD AND NEW PUB USE SAISG5 VERSION; BUT THE NEW CORE IMAGE IS
3K BIGGER THAN IT USED TO BE 7 WEEKS AGO. ANY IDEA WHY? I ONLY
ADDED A LINE OR TWO OF CODE. (COMPARE PUB2.DMP AND PUB2.OLD
--- LARRY TESLER
05-MAR-73 1151 2,TES
Russ: We need to fix the realin (intin) and any associated code
to handle overflow conditions by having a JFCL immediately following
any instruction which can cause an overflow. In particular, realin
with a large integer part followed by a large number of fraction part
zerowill cause an overflow.
14-MAR-73 2024 1,PDQ
RUSS: I GOT A "DRYROT AT EFORM" MESSAGE WHEN TRYING TO COMPILE
FILE AESTH.SAI[A,JEG]. DAN SAID IT WAS A COMPILER ERROR AND THAT
YOU ARE THE PERSON TO SEE. SUGGESTIONS? THANKS.
07-APR-73 1850 A,JEG
∂15-MAY-73 0329 2,TES
The new version of SAIL will not compile PUB.
See PPSAV.PUB[2,TES]. I tried twice.
∂15-MAY-73 0202 SLS,DCS
Larry Tesler couldn't get PUB up with new segment, so I
managed to get one running with SAISG5.513, SSAVED it
and changed named of segment to SAISGN -- put it on the
system. The old dmp is PUB.DMP[
(sorry) PUB.DMP[SLS,DCS] if you want to try again, else
please delete it. Larry will probably follow advice and
put it up with the library, at least for a while, soon.
∂15-MAY-73 0648 GEM,TVR
Thank you for the pleasure of reloading my program because of change to SAISG5!
∂04-JUN-73 1245 SLS,DCS AT TTY62
Sorry -- wasn't careful enuf in my examination of the problem. SGLIGN
is MISSING from HLBSA5, tho PRESENT in LIBSA5!!!! What a strange
situation. I refrained from inserting it, so you could study the
anomaly in situ if you wished.
∂04-JUN-73 1025 LDE,DCS
IS THERE ANY GOOD REASON THAT POW & FPOW ARE NOT MADE "HERE"?? SINCE THE
COMPILER CALLS THEM DIRECTLY, SOMETIMES, ANYTIME A NEW SEGMENT IS MADE, A
NEW COMPILER MUST ALSO NEEDS BE MADE.
∂03-JUN-73 1105 SLS,DCS
There are no HEAD syms on either library. Weiss du das?